Chapter 4. Trade Secrets.


  • Current through October 23, 2012
  • For the purposes of this chapter, the term:

    (1) "Improper means" means theft, bribery, misrepresentation, breach or inducement of a breach of a duty to maintain secrecy, or espionage through electronic or other means.

    (2) "Misappropriation" means:

    (A) Acquisition of a trade secret of another by a person who knows or has reason to know that the trade secret was acquired by improper means; or

    (B) Disclosure or use of a trade secret of another without express or implied consent by a person who:

    (i) Used improper means to acquire knowledge of the trade secret; or

    (ii) At the time of disclosure or use, knew or had reason to know that the trade secret was:

    (I) Derived from or through a person who had utilized improper means to acquire it;

    (II) Acquired under circumstances giving rise to a duty to maintain its secrecy or limit its use;

    (III) Derived from or through a person who owed a duty to the person seeking relief to maintain its secrecy or limit its use; or

    (iii) Before a material change in his or her position, knew or had reason to know that the information was a trade secret and knowledge of the trade secret had been acquired by accident or mistake.

    (3) "Person" means a natural person, corporation, estate, trust, partnership, association, joint venture, government, governmental subdivision or agency, or any other legal or commercial entity.

    (4) "Trade secret" means information, including a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, or process, that:

    (A) Derives actual or potential independent economic value, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by, proper means by another who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use; and

    (B) Is the subject of reasonable efforts to maintain its secrecy.

    (Mar. 16, 1989, D.C. Law 7-216, § 2, 36 DCR 519.)

    HISTORICAL AND STATUTORY NOTES

    Prior Codifications

    1981 Ed., § 48-501.

    Legislative History of Laws

    Law 7-216, the "Uniform Trade Secrets Act of 1988," was introduced in Council and assigned Bill No. 7-426, which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. The Bill was adopted on first and second readings on November 29, 1988 and December 13, 1988, respectively. Signed by the Mayor on January 6, 1989, it was assigned Act No. 7-291 and transmitted to both Houses of Congress for its review.

    Uniform Law

    This section is based upon § 1 of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act. See 14 Uniform Laws Annotated, Master Edition, or ULA Database on WESTLAW.

  • Current through October 23, 2012 Back to Top
  • (a) Actual or threatened misappropriation may be enjoined. Upon application to the court, an injunction shall be terminated when the trade secret has ceased to exist, but the injunction may be continued for a reasonable period of time to eliminate commercial advantage that otherwise would be derived from the misappropriation.

    (b) In exceptional circumstances, an injunction may condition future use upon payment of a reasonable royalty for no longer than the period of time for which use could have been prohibited. Exceptional circumstances include, but are not limited to, a material and prejudicial change of position prior to acquiring knowledge or reason to know of a misappropriation that renders a prohibitive injunction inequitable.

    (c) In appropriate circumstances, an affirmative act to protect a trade secret may be compelled by court order.

    (Mar. 16, 1989, D.C. Law 7-216, § 3, 36 DCR 519.)

    HISTORICAL AND STATUTORY NOTES

    Prior Codifications

    1981 Ed., § 48-502.

    Legislative History of Laws

    For legislative history of D.C. Law 7-216, see Historical and Statutory Notes following § 36-401.

    Uniform Law

    This section is based upon § 2 of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act. See 14 Uniform Laws Annotated, Master Edition, or ULA Database on WESTLAW.

  • Current through October 23, 2012 Back to Top
  • (a) A complainant is entitled to recover damages for misappropriation, unless a material and prejudicial change of position prior to acquiring knowledge or reason to know of the misappropriation renders a monetary recovery inequitable. Damages may include both the actual loss caused by the misappropriation and the unjust enrichment caused by the misappropriation that is not taken into account in computing actual loss. Instead of damages measured by other methods, the damages caused by misappropriation may be measured by the imposition of liability for a reasonable royalty for the unauthorized disclosure or use of a trade secret by a misappropriator.

    (b) If willful and malicious misappropriation exists, the court may award exemplary damages in an amount not exceeding twice the award made under subsection (a) of this section.

    (Mar. 16, 1989, D.C. Law 7-216, § 4, 36 DCR 519.)

    HISTORICAL AND STATUTORY NOTES

    Prior Codifications

    1981 Ed., § 48-503.

    Legislative History of Laws

    For legislative history of D.C. Law 7-216, see Historical and Statutory Notes following § 36-401.

    Uniform Law

    This section is based upon § 3 of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act. See 14 Uniform Laws Annotated, Master Edition, or ULA Database on WESTLAW.

  • Current through October 23, 2012 Back to Top
  • The court may award reasonable attorney's fees to the prevailing party if:

    (1) A claim of misappropriation is made in bad faith;

    (2) A motion to terminate an injunction is made or resisted in bad faith; or

    (3) Willful and malicious misappropriation exists.

    (Mar. 16, 1989, D.C. Law 7-216, § 5, 36 DCR 519.)

    HISTORICAL AND STATUTORY NOTES

    Prior Codifications

    1981 Ed., § 48-504.

    Legislative History of Laws

    For legislative history of D.C. Law 7-216, see Historical and Statutory Notes following § 36-401.

    Uniform Law

    This section is based upon § 4 of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act. See 14 Uniform Laws Annotated, Master Edition, or ULA Database on WESTLAW.

  • Current through October 23, 2012 Back to Top
  • In an action under this chapter, a court shall preserve the secrecy of an alleged trade secret by reasonable means, which may include granting protective orders in connection with discovery proceedings, holding in-camera hearings, or sealing the records of the action and ordering any person involved in the litigation not to disclose an alleged trade secret without prior court approval.

    (Mar. 16, 1989, D.C. Law 7-216, § 6, 36 DCR 519.)

    HISTORICAL AND STATUTORY NOTES

    Prior Codifications

    1981 Ed., § 48-505.

    Legislative History of Laws

    For legislative history of D.C. Law 7-216, see Historical and Statutory Notes following § 36-401.

    Uniform Law

    This section is based upon § 5 of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act. See 14 Uniform Laws Annotated, Master Edition, or ULA Database on WESTLAW.

  • Current through October 23, 2012 Back to Top
  • An action for misappropriation must be brought within 3 years after the misappropriation is discovered or, by the exercise of reasonable diligence, should have been discovered. For the purposes of this section, a continuing misappropriation constitutes a single claim.

    (Mar. 16, 1989, D.C. Law 7-216, § 7, 36 DCR 519.)

    HISTORICAL AND STATUTORY NOTES

    Prior Codifications

    1981 Ed., § 48-506.

    Legislative History of Laws

    For legislative history of D.C. Law 7-216, see Historical and Statutory Notes following § 36-401.

    Uniform Law

    This section is based upon § 6 of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act. See 14 Uniform Laws Annotated, Master Edition, or ULA Database on WESTLAW.

  • Current through October 23, 2012 Back to Top
  • (a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, this chapter supersedes conflicting tort, restitution and other law of the District of Columbia providing civil remedies for misappropriation of a trade secret.

    (b) This chapter does not affect:

    (1) Contractual remedies, whether or not based upon misappropriation of a trade secret;

    (2) Other civil remedies that are not based upon misappropriation of a trade secret; or

    (3) Criminal remedies, whether or not based upon misappropriation of a trade secret.

    (Mar. 16, 1989, D.C. Law 7-216, § 8, 36 DCR 519.)

    HISTORICAL AND STATUTORY NOTES

    Prior Codifications

    1981 Ed., § 48-507.

    Legislative History of Laws

    For legislative history of D.C. Law 7-216, see Historical and Statutory Notes following § 36-401.

    Uniform Law

    This section is based upon § 7 of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act. See 14 Uniform Laws Annotated, Master Edition, or ULA Database on WESTLAW.

  • Current through October 23, 2012 Back to Top
  • This chapter shall be applied and construed to make uniform the law with respect to trade secrets among the District of Columbia and those states enacting it.

    (Mar. 16, 1989, D.C. Law 7-216, § 9, 36 DCR 519.)

    HISTORICAL AND STATUTORY NOTES

    Prior Codifications

    1981 Ed., § 48-508.

    Legislative History of Laws

    For legislative history of D.C. Law 7-216, see Historical and Statutory Notes following § 36-401.

    Uniform Law

    This section is based upon § 8 of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act. See 14 Uniform Laws Annotated, Master Edition, or ULA Database on WESTLAW.

  • Current through October 23, 2012 Back to Top
  • This chapter does not apply to misappropriation occurring prior to March 16, 1989. With respect to a continuing misappropriation that began prior to March 16, 1989, the chapter does not apply to the continuing misappropriation that occurs after March 16, 1989.

    (Mar. 16, 1989, D.C. Law 7-216, § 10, 36 DCR 519.)

    HISTORICAL AND STATUTORY NOTES

    Prior Codifications

    1981 Ed., § 48-509.

    Legislative History of Laws

    For legislative history of D.C. Law 7-216, see Historical and Statutory Notes following § 36-401.

    Uniform Law

    This section is based upon § 11 of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act. See 14 Uniform Laws Annotated, Master Edition, or ULA Database on WESTLAW.

  • Current through October 23, 2012 Back to Top
  • (a) Nothing in this chapter shall prevent the disclosure of accurate and specific information to the Mayor, other District officers or their representatives, private or public sector employees, or the Occupational Safety and Health Commission if necessary to enforce § 32-1101 et seq.

    (b) Nothing in this chapter shall prevent the disclosure of information to the Mayor or other District officers or employees if necessary to enforce the Pesticide Operations Act of 1978.

    (Mar. 16, 1989, D.C. Law 7-216, § 11, 36 DCR 519.)

    HISTORICAL AND STATUTORY NOTES

    Prior Codifications

    1981 Ed., § 48-510.

    Legislative History of Laws

    For legislative history of D.C. Law 7-216, see Historical and Statutory Notes following § 36-401.

    References in Text

    The "Pesticide Operations Act of 1978," referred to in subsection (b), is D.C. Law 2-70, which is not codified.

  • Refs & Annos

    Jurisdiction
    Laws
    Effective Date
    Statutory Citation
    Alabama
    1987, No. 87-669
    8-12-1987
    Code 1975, §§ 8-27-1 to 8-27-6.
    Alaska
    1988, c. 103
    9-2-1988
    AS 45.50.910 to 45.50.945.
    Arizona
    1990, c. 37
    4-11-1990[FN*]
    A.R.S. §§ 44-401 to 44-407.
    Arkansas
    Acts 1981, No. 439
    3-12-1981[FN*]
    A.C.A. §§ 4-75-601 to 4-75-607.
    California
    1984, c. 1724
    1-1-1985
    West's Ann.Cal.Civ.Code §§ 3426 to 3426.11.
    Colorado
    1986, c. 63
    7-1-1986
    West's C.R.S.A. §§ 7-74-101 to 7-74-110.
    Connecticut
    1983, No. 344
    6-23-1983[FN*]
    C.G.S.A. §§ 35-50 to 35-58.
    Delaware
    1982 [63 Del.Laws], c. 218
    4-15-1982
    6 Del.C. §§ 2001 to 2009.
    District of Columbia
    1989, D.C.Law 7-216
    3-16-1989[FN*]
    D.C. Official Code, 2001 Ed. §§ 36-401 to 36-410.
    Florida
    1988, c. 88-254
    10-1-1988
    West's F.S.A. §§ 688.001 to 688.009.
    Georgia
    1990, p. 1560
    7-1-1990
    GCA §§ 10-1-760 to 10-1-767.
    Hawaii
    1989, Act 221
    7-1-1989
    HRS §§ 482B-1 to 482B-9.
    Idaho
    1981, c. 240
    I.C. §§ 48-801 to 48-807.
    Illinois
    1987, P.A. 85-366
    1-1-1988
    S.H.A. 765 ILCS 1065/1 to 1065/9.
    Indiana
    1982, No. 1257
    2-25-1982[FN*]
    West's A.I.C. 24-2-3-1 to 24-2-3-8.
    Iowa
    1990, S.F. 2395
    4-27-1990[FN*]
    I.C.A. §§ 550.1 to 550.8.
    Kansas
    1981, c. 214
    7-1-1981
    K.S.A. 60-3320 to 60-3330.
    Kentucky
    1990, c. 300
    4-6-1990[FN*]
    KRS 365.880 to 365.900.
    Louisiana
    1981, No. 462
    7-19-1981[FN*]
    LSA-R.S. 51:1431 to 51:1439.
    Maine
    1987, c. 143
    5-22-1987
    10 M.R.S.A. §§ 1541 to 1548.
    Maryland
    1989, c. 598
    7-1-1989
    Code, Commercial Law, §§ 11-1201 to 11-1209.
    Michigan
    1998, P.A. 448
    10-1-1998
    M.C.L.A. §§ 445.1901 to 445.1910.
    Minnesota
    1980, c. 594
    1-1-1981
    M.S.A. §§ 325C.01 to 325C.08.
    Mississippi
    1990, c. 442
    7-1-1990
    Code 1972, §§ 75-26-1 to 75-26-19.
    Missouri
    1995, S.B. Nos. 80 & 88
    8-28-1995
    V.A.M.S. §§ 417.450 to 417.467.
    Montana
    1985, c. 104
    MCA 30-14-401 to 30-14-409.
    Nebraska
    L.1988, LB 337A
    7-9-1988
    R.R.S.1943, §§ 87-501 to 87-507.
    Nevada
    1987, c. 15
    3-5-1987
    N.R.S. 600A.010 to 600A.100.
    New Hampshire
    1989, 220:1
    1-1-1990
    RSA 350-B:1 to 350-B:9.
    New Jersey
    2012, c. 161
    1-5-2012
    N.J.S.A. 56:15-1 to 56:15-9.
    New Mexico
    1989, c. 156
    4-3-1989[FN*]
    NMSA 1978, §§ 57-3A-1 to 57-3A-7.
    North Dakota
    1983, c. 508
    7-1-1983
    NDCC 47-25.1-01 to 47-25.1-08.
    Ohio
    1994, H.B. 320
    7-20-1994
    R.C. §§ 1333.61 to 1333.69.
    Oklahoma
    1986, c. 85
    1-1-1986
    78 Okl.St.Ann. §§ 85 to 94.
    Oregon
    1987, c. 537
    1-1-1988
    ORS 646.461 to 646.475.
    Pennsylvania
    2004, c. 14
    2-19-2004[FN*]
    12 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 5301 to 5308.
    Rhode Island
    1986, c. 439
    7-1-1986
    Gen.Laws 1956, §§ 6-41-1 to 6-41-11.
    South Carolina
    1997, Act 38
    5-21-1997
    Code 1976, §§ 39-8-10 to 39-8-130.
    South Dakota
    SL 1988, c. 354
    7-1-1988
    SDCL 37-29-1 to 37-29-11.
    Tennessee
    2000, c. 647
    7-1-2000
    T.C.A. §§ 47-25-1701 to 47-25-1709.
    Utah
    1989, c. 60
    5-1-1989
    U.C.A.1953, 13-24-1 to 13-24-9.
    Vermont
    1996, No. 90
    7-1-1996
    9 V.S.A. §§ 4601 to 4609, 12 V.S.A. § 523.
    Virgin Islands
    2005, No. 6730
    3-5-2005[FN*]
    11 V.I.C. §§ 1001 to 1010.
    Virginia
    1986, c. 210
    7-1-1986
    Code 1950, §§ 59.1-336 to 59.1-343.
    Washington
    1981, c. 286
    1-1-1982
    West's RCWA 19.108.010 to 19.108.940.
    West Virginia
    1986, c. 168
    7-1-1986
    Code, 47-22-1 to 47-22-10.
    Wisconsin
    1985, Act 236
    4-24-1986
    W.S.A. 134.90.
    Wyoming
    2006, c. 63
    7-1-2006
    Wyo.Stat.Ann. §§ 40-24-101 to 40-24-110.
    [FN*] Date of approval.