• Current through October 23, 2012

The Council of the District of Columbia finds:

(1) That there exists a public perception that the District budget approved by the Council, after considerable careful public examination, is the plan which determines the manner in which District funds will be spent;

(2) That the District's new financial management system, which became operative in fiscal year 1980, provides the Council a new level of budget information;

(3) That questions remain in regard to the role of the Council with respect to ongoing oversight and control of the District budget;

(4) That a large portion of the District's annual expenditures are funded by grants from the federal government and private sources. Although these grant funds are a major portion of the District's program process, to a great extent, planning and allocation of these funds are without public participation through the legislative process;

(5) That under the District's new financial management system, the Council will be excluded from approval or review of federal grant funds to District agencies;

(6) That the District does not have a legislative process to address and control all city expenditures from all revenue sources; and

(7) That there is a need to clearly define the continuing role of the Council in the budget process in order to resolve those questions critical to the shaping of public policy and the prudent management of publicly entrusted tax dollars.

(Sept. 16, 1980, D.C. Law 3-104, § 2, 27 DCR 3748; enacted, Apr. 9, 1997, D.C. Law 11-254, § 2, 44 DCR 1575.)

HISTORICAL AND STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Codifications

1981 Ed., § 47-381.

Legislative History of Laws

Law 3-104, the "District of Columbia Funds Control Act of 1980," was introduced in Council and assigned Bill No. 3-169, which was referred to the Committee of the Whole. The Bill was adopted on first and second readings on June 17, 1980 and July 1, 1980, respectively. Disapproved by the Mayor on July 22, 1980, but re-enacted on July 29, 1980, it was assigned Act No. 3-229 and transmitted to both Houses of Congress for its review.